Which states each brand actually documents

Why 5 brands are missing from the columns

A state list is the cheapest document in this market and the least often published in a readable form. The missing columns are missing for one of three reasons: the terms sit behind a bot wall that answers with a challenge page, the page renders the list client-side so what arrives is an empty shell, or the site geo-blocks a reader outside the United States and never shows the list at all. Most are the first.

This is not a technicality. A brand that will not let its state list be read is a brand whose availability cannot be checked by anyone except a visitor who is already inside its market, which is precisely the reader who least needs the answer.

What the documented columns have in common

Most of the twenty are the older operators in the set. Three VGW brands share one restricted-territory list; High 5 publishes a two-column state table; Chumba's geo-block notice doubles as its list; the rest publish exclusion lists inside their terms. Several newer additions were only readable through an alternate document, which is why the provenance column matters as much as the cells.

The pattern is not virtue: a brand with a long history and something to lose writes things down. A brand launched in 2026 with a marketing site and no legal page has made a different calculation about how much it wants to be read.

How to use this table without over-reading it

A dot is not a promise. It means the brand's own list does not exclude the state on the date in the column header, and nothing more: a brand can accept a registration in a state where its cashier will not release a prize, and several do exactly that with a partial restriction.

The cashier is the test the table cannot run. Open it, look at whether sweeps coins are purchasable and redeemable, and treat that as the answer for your state. If the answer is unclear, ask support in writing and keep the reply: it is dated, it names your account, and it is the only version an operator has to stand behind.

How the matrix was assembled

Each column comes from one document, read on the date in its header. Where the document is the operator's own page the column says so; where it is a third party reading of the operator's terms, the column says that instead. No cell was filled by inference from another brand, another state or an affiliate table.

Rows come from the state reference on this site, which carries a tier for all fifty-one jurisdictions. The fifteen closed jurisdictions are rendered as closed rather than as brand behaviour, because a statute does not depend on a list being current: Oklahoma joined that group on 1 November 2026 and at least one brand still omits it.

What would fill the empty columns

One deploy per brand. A terms page served as text with a version date, naming the states it excludes, would move a brand from missing to documented in the time it takes to publish it. Nothing else is required: no licence, no partnership, no review call.

Until then these 5 columns stay blank, and this page stays honest about the size of the gap. A coverage matrix that filled them with a guess would be the single most useful-looking and least reliable page on the site.